Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10(03): 409-420
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1691842
Research Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Consensus Development of a Modern Ontology of Emergency Department Presenting Problems—The Hierarchical Presenting Problem Ontology (HaPPy)

Steven Horng
1   Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
2   Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Nathaniel R. Greenbaum
1   Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
2   Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Larry A. Nathanson
1   Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
2   Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
James C. McClay
3   Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
,
Foster R. Goss
4   Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
,
Jeffrey A. Nielson
5   Northeastern Ohio Medical University, University Hospitals Samaritan Medical Center, Ashland, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding Administrative support was partially funded by an American College of Emergency Physicians Section Grant.
Further Information

Publication History

27 February 2019

24 April 2019

Publication Date:
12 June 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective Numerous attempts have been made to create a standardized “presenting problem” or “chief complaint” list to characterize the nature of an emergency department visit. Previous attempts have failed to gain widespread adoption as they were not freely shareable or did not contain the right level of specificity, structure, and clinical relevance to gain acceptance by the larger emergency medicine community. Using real-world data, we constructed a presenting problem list that addresses these challenges.

Materials and Methods We prospectively captured the presenting problems for 180,424 consecutive emergency department patient visits at an urban, academic, Level I trauma center in the Boston metro area. No patients were excluded. We used a consensus process to iteratively derive our system using real-world data. We used the first 70% of consecutive visits to derive our ontology, followed by a 6-month washout period, and the remaining 30% for validation. All concepts were mapped to Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine–Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT).

Results Our system consists of a polyhierarchical ontology containing 692 unique concepts, 2,118 synonyms, and 30,613 nonvisible descriptions to correct misspellings and nonstandard terminology. Our ontology successfully captured structured data for 95.9% of visits in our validation data set.

Discussion and Conclusion We present the HierArchical Presenting Problem ontologY (HaPPy). This ontology was empirically derived and then iteratively validated by an expert consensus panel. HaPPy contains 692 presenting problem concepts, each concept being mapped to SNOMED CT. This freely sharable ontology can help to facilitate presenting problem-based quality metrics, research, and patient care.

Data Availability

As a derivative work of SNOMED CT, the HierArchical Presenting Problem ontologY (HaPPy) is released freely to anyone with a valid SNOMED CT license. The ontology as well as analysis toolkit can be downloaded via our Web site http://bit.ly/2KVZJPp.


Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This project was reviewed by the Committee on Clinical Investigations at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and a determination (#2019D000313) was made that this activity did not constitute Human Subjects Research and no further review was required.


 
  • References

  • 1 Macfarlane D. The lexeme hypotheses: their use to generate highly grammatical and completely computerized medical records. Med Hypotheses 2016; 92: 75-79
  • 2 Bronnert J, Masarie C, Naeymi-Rad F, Rose E, Aldin G. Problem-centered care delivery: how interface terminology makes standardized health information possible. J AHIMA 2012; 83 (07) 30-35
  • 3 Boyce RD, Jao J, Miller T, Kane-Gill SL. Automated screening of emergency department notes for drug-associated bleeding adverse events occurring in older adults. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (04) 1022-1030
  • 4 Kummer BR, Lerario MP, Navi BB. , et al. Clinical information systems integration in New York City's first mobile stroke unit. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (01) 89-98
  • 5 Sundaresan AS, Schneider G, Reynolds J, Kirchner HL. Identifying asthma exacerbation-related emergency department visit using electronic medical record and claims data. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (03) 528-540
  • 6 Data Elements for Emergency Department Systems, Release 1.0 (DEEDS): a summary report. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5 (02) 185-193
  • 7 Collier R. Rethinking EHR interfaces to reduce click fatigue and physician burnout. CMAJ 2018; 190 (33) E994-E995
  • 8 Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and Their Implications for Patient Care, Health Systems, and Health Policy | RAND. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR439.html . Accessed April 14, 2019
  • 9 Babbott S, Manwell LB, Brown R. , et al. Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: results from the MEMO Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (Suppl. 01) e100-e106
  • 10 Roberts DL, Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, West CP. A national comparison of burnout and work-life balance among internal medicine hospitalists and outpatient general internists. J Hosp Med 2014; 9 (03) 176-181
  • 11 Hose B-Z, Hoonakker PLT, Wooldridge AR. , et al. Physician perceptions of the electronic problem list in pediatric trauma care. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 113-122
  • 12 Travers DA, Haas SW. Unified medical language system coverage of emergency-medicine chief complaints. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13 (12) 1319-1323
  • 13 Haas SW, Travers D, Tintinalli JE. , et al. Toward vocabulary control for chief complaint. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15 (05) 476-482
  • 14 Medical Terminology Software - IMO Intelligent Medical Objects. Available at: https://www.e-imo.com/ . Accessed March 27, 2019
  • 15 Aronsky D, Kendall D, Merkley K, James BC, Haug PJ. A comprehensive set of coded chief complaints for the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8 (10) 980-989
  • 16 Thompson DA, Eitel D, Fernandes CMB, Pines JM, Amsterdam J, Davidson SJ. Coded chief complaints--automated analysis of free-text complaints. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13 (07) 774-782
  • 17 Jones BE, South BR, Shao Y. , et al. Development and validation of a natural language processing tool to identify patients treated for pneumonia across VA emergency departments. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (01) 122-128
  • 18 Handly N, Thompson DA, Li J, Chuirazzi DM, Venkat A. Evaluation of a hospital admission prediction model adding coded chief complaint data using neural network methodology. Eur J Emerg Med 2015; 22 (02) 87-91
  • 19 Silva JC, Shah SC, Rumoro DP. , et al. Comparing the accuracy of syndrome surveillance systems in detecting influenza-like illness: GUARDIAN vs. RODS vs. electronic medical record reports. Artif Intell Med 2013; 59 (03) 169-174
  • 20 Wagner MM, Espino J, Tsui FC. , et al. Syndrome and outbreak detection using chief-complaint data--experience of the Real-Time Outbreak and Disease Surveillance project. MMWR Suppl 2004; 53: 28-31
  • 21 Tsui F-C, Espino JU, Dato VM, Gesteland PH, Hutman J, Wagner MM. Technical description of RODS: a real-time public health surveillance system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (05) 399-408
  • 22 Rha B, Burrer S, Park S, Trivedi T, Parashar UD, Lopman BA. Emergency department visit data for rapid detection and monitoring of norovirus activity, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2013; 19 (08) 1214-1221
  • 23 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Monitoring health effects of wildfires using the biosense system--San Diego County, California, October 2007. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57 (27) 741-744
  • 24 Dara J, Dowling JN, Travers D, Cooper GF, Chapman WW. Evaluation of preprocessing techniques for chief complaint classification. J Biomed Inform 2008; 41 (04) 613-623
  • 25 Chapman WW, Dowling JN, Wagner MM. Classification of emergency department chief complaints into 7 syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 527,228 patients. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46 (05) 445-455
  • 26 Mikosz CA, Silva J, Black S, Gibbs G, Cardenas I. Comparison of two major emergency department-based free-text chief-complaint coding systems. MMWR Suppl 2004; 53: 101-105
  • 27 Niiranen ST, Yli-Hietanen JM, Nathanson LA. Toward reflective management of emergency department chief complaint information. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2008; 12 (06) 763-767
  • 28 Ferraro JP, Ye Y, Gesteland PH. , et al. The effects of natural language processing on cross-institutional portability of influenza case detection for disease surveillance. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (02) 560-580
  • 29 Bickley LS, Szilagyi PG, Hoffman RM. Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer;
  • 30 Cimino JJ. In defense of the desiderata. J Biomed Inform 2006; 39 (03) 299-306
  • 31 Liu K, Hogan WR, Crowley RS. Natural Language Processing methods and systems for biomedical ontology learning. J Biomed Inform 2011; 44 (01) 163-179
  • 32 Lavelle J, Schast A, Keren R. Standardizing care processes and improving quality using pathways and continuous quality improvement. Curr Treat Options Pediatr 2015; 1 (04) 347-358
  • 33 Griffey RT, Pines JM, Farley HL. , et al. Chief complaint-based performance measures: a new focus for acute care quality measurement. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 65 (04) 387-395
  • 34 Schuur JD, Hsia RY, Burstin H, Schull MJ, Pines JM. Quality measurement in the emergency department: past and future. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32 (12) 2129-2138
  • 35 Martin TJ, Ranney ML, Dorroh J, Asselin N, Sarkar IN. Health information exchange in emergency medical services. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (04) 884-891
  • 36 eCQMs | eCQI Resource Center. Available at: https://ecqi.healthit.gov/ecqms . Accessed March 27, 2019
  • 37 Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (03) 277-288
  • 38 Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision making. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 41 (01) 110-120
  • 39 Daniel M, Khandelwal S, Santen SA, Malone M, Croskerry P. Cognitive debiasing strategies for the emergency department. AEM Educ Train 2017; 1 (01) 41-42
  • 40 Gephi - The Open Graph Viz Platform. Available at: https://gephi.org/ . Accessed March 27, 2019
  • 41 Walker HK, Hall WD. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical and Laboratory Examinations. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1990: 1087
  • 42 Zhou L, Plasek JM, Mahoney LM, Chang FY, DiMaggio D, Rocha RA. Mapping Partners Master Drug Dictionary to RxNorm using an NLP-based approach. J Biomed Inform 2012; 45 (04) 626-633
  • 43 Goss FR, Zhou L, Plasek JM. , et al. Evaluating standard terminologies for encoding allergy information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013; 20 (05) 969-979
  • 44 Arp R, Smith B, Spear AD. Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2015: 244
  • 45 Greenbaum NR, Jernite Y, Halpern Y. , et al. Contextual autocomplete: a novel user interface using machine learning to improve ontology usage and structured data capture for presenting problems in the emergency department. bioRxiv 2017; DOI: 10.1101/127092.
  • 46 Value Set Authority Center. Available at: https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/ . Accessed April 3, 2019
  • 47 ACEP // CEDR Home. Available at: https://www.acep.org/cedr/ . Accessed March 27, 2019
  • 48 Deakyne Davies SJ, Grundmeier RW, Campos DA. , et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. The pediatric emergency care applied research network registry: a multicenter electronic health record registry of pediatric emergency care. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (02) 366-376